[packman] Re: SDL duplicates

Martin Vogt vogt at itwm.fraunhofer.de
Mon Apr 30 10:09:10 CEST 2007


Martin Vogt wrote:
> 
> Hello List,
> 
> 
> 
> I have an unresolved dependency problem with the update of lincity.
> 


Hello again,

I fixed it myself, by removing the -16 version, from an older packman
update.
But now it installs the SDL_gfx from the SuSE inst-source.

The reason is that the SuSE version is SDL_gfx-2.0.13-16.
but the packman version is:SDL_gfx-2.0.13-1

So it does not get the version from packman.
And it does look that the SuSE version does not
work, at least lincity gives only a black screen.

There are two soltions:

- bump the 2.0.13 to higer than 16 or use the 2.0.16 version, which
was present some time ago, but didtn fullfill the requierement for lincity.

reagrds,


Martin




> 
>> --> Processing Dependency: libSDL_gfx.so.13()(64bit) for package:
>> lincity-ng
>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>> Error: Missing Dependency: libSDL_gfx.so.13()(64bit) is needed by
>> package lincity-ng
> 
> The reason is, that there were two SDL library installed recentyl, but
> with different versions:
> 
> Version 16:
> 
> rpm -qpi ./packman10.1/rpm/x86_64/SDL_gfx-2.0.16-1.pm.1.x86_64.rpm:
> Name        : SDL_gfx                      Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version     : 2.0.16                            Vendor:
> http://packman.links2lin
> ux.org
> Release     : 1.pm.1                        Build Date: Sat 21 Apr 2007
> 11:33:26
>  PM CEST
> Install date: (not installed)               Build Host: detlef-pc
> 
> 
> Version 13:
> vogt at fs2[R0]>rpm -qpi
> ./packman10.1/rpm/x86_64/SDL_gfx-2.0.13-1.pm.1.x86_64.rpm
> Name        : SDL_gfx                      Relocations: /usr
> Version     : 2.0.13                            Vendor: Packman
> Release     : 1.pm.1                        Build Date: Mon 23 Apr 2007
> 12:18:10
>  AM CEST
> Install date: (not installed)               Build Host: detlef-pc
> Group       : Development/Libraries/X11     Source RPM:
> SDL_gfx-2.0.13-1.pm.1.sr
> c.rpm
> 
> 
> 
> regards,
> 
> Martin Vogt
> 
> 
> 
> 






More information about the Packman mailing list