[packman] package "A_tw-ffmpeg-5"

[munix9]

I'm just guessing, but could something similar in the spec file help?

%define flavor @BUILD_FLAVOR@%{nil}
%if "%{flavor}" == ""
ExclusiveArch: do-not-build
%endif


Am 25.01.23 um 19:48 schrieb Manfred Hollstein:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> I saw you made the change to the _multibuild file. I now tried to get
> this change done in the package on OBS (multimedia:libs/ffmpeg-5), but
> shortly after it got accepted, it was revoked because it results in the
> following:
> 
>    ffmpeg-5 gets built
>    ffmpeg-5:ffmpeg-5 gets built
>    ffmpeg-5:ffmpeg-5-mini gets built
> 
> Obviously ffmpeg-5:ffmpeg-5 is not necessary and could be avoided by
> fixing the _multibuild logic in OBS.
> 
> What do you think, shall we stick with fixing _multibuild files (I
> remember a similar problem with one package needed by kodi long ago), or
> shouldn't this be properly fixed in OBS?
> 
> TIA, cheers.
> 
> l8er
> manfred
> 
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, 17:13:43 +0100, munix9 wrote:
>>
>> seems to be solved.
>> thanks!
>>
>> Am 25.01.23 um 12:19 schrieb munix9:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a question about the package "A_tw-ffmpeg-5":
>>> This is not built anymore since "A_tw-ffmpeg-5:ffmpeg-5-mini" (see
>>> https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/Essentials/A_tw-ffmpeg-5) and
>>> so zypper wants to exchange ffmpeg-5 from packman with the one from
>>> openSUSE.
>>> Is this all intentional and desired or is something preventing the build
>>> of A_tw-ffmpeg-5 on packman (pmbs says: All the results have state
>>> excluded/disabled)?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Packman mailing list
>>> Packman at links2linux.de
>>> https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman