[packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)
martin at pluskal.org
Wed Aug 2 10:28:48 CEST 2017
On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 10:25 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote:
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 at 10:08 AM
> From: martin at pluskal.org
> > On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 21:41 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote:
> > > No. I was talking about the copyring attribution for the spec
> > > file
> > > itself, with which I seem to recall
> > > from a previous interaction OP has a problem with.
> > >
> > > Now, I assume that a commercial entity like SUSE can't afford to
> > > distribute anything where the IP is not
> > > clearly defined, even for a mere script.
> > >
> > > Would Packman be more lenient in that regard?
> > As Richard explained, this might be a bit dangerous adventure for
> > packman. Apart from that I would say that motivation for moving to
> > packman is a bit weak - my understanding is that move is motivated
> > by
> > hurt feelings after discussion about copyright attribution with OP,
> > and
> > by his opposition against including hamradio/sdr stuff in Factory
> > and
> > Leap.
> Before slandering anyone, now I see that packages in
> have the following header:
> # spec file for package foo
> # Copyright (c) 2017 Walter Fey DL8FCL
> # This file is under MIT license
> Is this the reeason why OBS doesn't want it? Would packman?
This state is afaik absolutely OK for OBS/openSUSE distribution.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Packman