[packman] Solved! was: Re: Something is wrong with updates

[yahoo-pier_andreit]

On 12/26/2013 06:22 PM, Stefan Botter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 16:24:01 +0100
> Peter Czanik <pczanik at fang.fa.gau.hu> wrote:
>
>> On 12/25/2013 07:56 PM, Herbert Graeber wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Am Sonntag, 22. Dezember 2013, 16:39:20 schrieb Peter Czanik:
>>>> I also reported it a few days ago. It seems to me, that some new
>>>> packages are built for i586 and used for fresh compiles, but are
>>>> never published, but stuck somewhere in the PackMan BuildService.
>>> Yes, ther had bee something wrong iwht the i586 repos.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile packmans OBS dispatcher is dead, so that currently
>>> nothing is building at all. I don't known who can fix that and if
>>> there is any hope to get it running over the christmas days :-(
>>
>> It seems to be fixed now, at least for the packages I use. Thanks!
>
> It is not that simple. Since Tuesday I tried to understand the problem,
> as it has _not_ been a problem with
> - the publisher,
> - the scheduler, or
> - with an individual package like lame, twolame or libvpx.
>
> To identify the source of the problem I stopped the dispatcher,
> restarted the scheduler, the srcserver, and did _lots_ of attempts to
> restart the scheduling of obviously correct builds using obs_admin.
>
> This morning I has a closer look at your problem reports, or better,
> the time when the problems started.
> It turns out, that the two new (or better old) workers added on Dec
> 16th seem to sometime produce strangely wrong builds, like compiling
> lame and not including the "Provides: libmp3lame.so.0", although the
> library is included all right in the RPM. There were also several build
> failed, where the build environment was not correctly set up.
>
> I have now excluded these two machines from builds and contacted the
> donor in the hope, that we can fix them and use them again.
>
> I will have a look at the side effects (wrong builds) and rebuild these
> packages. Essentials 13.1 is already fixed.
> Please expect this to take one or two days, as vacation time is
> "demanding" ;-)
>
>
> I have 16 additional workers over the holidays (swkj0[47],
> buildwk[12]), these may help to speed things up, but I have to take
> them away most probably on Jan 2nd again.
>
>
> Greetings, and Merry Christmas (what's left of it),
>
> Stefan
great...:-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
the day after christmas is your name-day.....:-) :-) :-) :-)
merry what-is-left-of-christmas and merry saint stefan :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)