[packman] live vs live555 and redland-bindings-1.0.14
gregkh at linux.com
Wed Jul 25 17:27:24 CEST 2012
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:56:12PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> On 25 July 2012 15:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linux.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> >> On 2 June 2012 14:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linux.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> >> >> On 18 April 2012 01:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linux.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Ok, but where did the version of redland-bindings come from? Shouldn't
> >> >> > I just link in the X11:common:Factory versions of redland AND
> >> >> > redland-bindings into Tumbleweed, instead of using the version of
> >> >> > redland from KDE-4.8?
> >> >>
> >> >> Sure.
> >> >
> >> > Now done.
> >> No, you didn't.
> >> $ osc cat -u openSUSE:Tumbleweed redland _link
> >> <link package="redland" project="KDE:Release:48"
> >> rev="f6ced863225677c1d17fbf3e4f05dcf3">
> > $ ./check_package X11:common:Factory/redland
> > # redland is up to date.
> They are up to date. And I'm going to delete the package from Packman
> since that fixes the problem. But that doesn't mean you are linking
> Tumbleweed's redland to X11:common:Factory as you said you did.
Well, my scripts, as shown above, sure think that it is linked properly :)
> If you have any good reason to link to KDE:Release:48 and that wasn't
> just a mistake great, I am not discussing that decision. Just
That's because it is the same exact package:
$ osc cat -u KDE:Release:48 redland _link
<link package="redland" project="KDE:Distro:Factory" rev="1" vrev="1">
$ osc cat -u KDE:Distro:Factory redland _link
<link project="X11:common:Factory" baserev="3f8fba80afab3f422aba84faaa247f71">
So we are linking in the correct package into openSUSE:Tumbleweed, it just so
happens that is the same package that is in KDE:Release:48 at the moment.
So all is well, right?
More information about the Packman