[packman] live vs live555 and redland-bindings-1.0.14

[Cristian Morales Vega]

On 25 July 2012 16:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linux.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:56:12PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
>> On 25 July 2012 15:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linux.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
>> >> On 2 June 2012 14:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linux.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
>> >> >> On 18 April 2012 01:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linux.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > Ok, but where did the version of redland-bindings come from?  Shouldn't
>> >> >> > I just link in the X11:common:Factory versions of redland AND
>> >> >> > redland-bindings into Tumbleweed, instead of using the version of
>> >> >> > redland from KDE-4.8?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sure.
>> >> >
>> >> > Now done.
>> >>
>> >> No, you didn't.
>> >>
>> >> $ osc cat -u openSUSE:Tumbleweed redland _link
>> >> <link package="redland" project="KDE:Release:48"
>> >> rev="f6ced863225677c1d17fbf3e4f05dcf3">
>> >
>> > $ ./check_package X11:common:Factory/redland
>> > # redland is up to date.
>>
>> They are up to date. And I'm going to delete the package from Packman
>> since that fixes the problem. But that doesn't mean you are linking
>> Tumbleweed's redland to X11:common:Factory as you said you did.
>
> Well, my scripts, as shown above, sure think that it is linked properly :)
>
>> If you have any good reason to link to KDE:Release:48 and that wasn't
>> just a mistake great, I am not discussing that decision. Just
>> informing.
>
> That's because it is the same exact package:
>
> $ osc cat -u KDE:Release:48 redland _link
> <link package="redland" project="KDE:Distro:Factory" rev="1" vrev="1">
> <patches>
>
>
>
>
> </patches>
> </link>
> $ osc cat -u KDE:Distro:Factory redland _link
> <link project="X11:common:Factory" baserev="3f8fba80afab3f422aba84faaa247f71">
>   <patches>
>     <branch/>
>   </patches>
> </link>
>
> So we are linking in the correct package into openSUSE:Tumbleweed, it just so
> happens that is the same package that is in KDE:Release:48 at the moment.
>
> So all is well, right?

Yes.
Really, I just told you in case you though you were directly linking
to X11:common:Factory. If you know you aren't and are happy with that
I don't see any problem.

I don't know if your scripts will help you detect problems if at some
point KDE:Release:48/redland starts to be different from
X11:common:Factory/redland, but that's up to you to handle. But just
in case your scripts depend on the output of those commands:
- KDE:Release:48 is linking to a specific revision of
KDE:Distro:Factory, when you do "osc cat -u KDE:Distro:Factory redland
_link" you are looking at the latest one.
- The output of "osc cat -u KDE:Distro:Factory redland _link" only
says the package was branched from X11:common:Factory at some specific
revision. It doesn't say if there are any differences between the
version in KDE:Distro:Factory and the version in X11:common:Factory.

So those commands don't shown the packages are exactly the same. But
since in this case they actually are the same, no problem.