[packman] broadcom-wl driver vs. Linux kernel v5.10
Manfred Hollstein
manfred.h at gmx.net
Tue Nov 24 14:31:09 CET 2020
Hi Ilgaz,
now being the maintainer of Essentials/broadcom-wl, I have accepted my
patch and rebuilt packages for the usual distro versions ;)
When you have a chance, I'd appreciate if you can test again the _real_
packages from PMBS Essentials and report back, if they work for you.
Cheers.
l8er
manfred
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, 11:40:44 +0100, Ilgaz Öcal wrote:
> >Hi Ilgaz,
>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, 11:07:00 +0100, Ilgaz Öcal wrote:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I have a broadcom 43142 here and would be happy to test.
>
> >Can you please test my package(s) on an current system, i.e. which does
> >not run a 5.10 based kernel? Based on your results I'd then know, if my
> >latest change works at all... :) So, anything of openSUSE Leap 15.1 or
> >15.2 or Tumbleweed would be sufficient. Thx.
>
> I am glad to report that it works fine on 5.9.10-2.gb7c3768-default
> (current) kernel. Actually I didn't even bother to configure that since it
> was failing all the time especially with secure boot on. Surprisingly it
> works all fine even with secure boot enabled.
>
> Have a nice day
>
> Ilgaz Öcal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.links2linux.de/pipermail/packman/attachments/20201124/1325185e/attachment.sig>
More information about the Packman
mailing list