[packman] PMBS - quo vadis?

[Martin Pluskal]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 11:09 +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> Indeed! Another example why the current approach to rely on some
> packages being provided by Factory first is kodi-17. It got build by
> some fellow packager here in PMBS with an libcec version that appears
> to
> be required kodi-17, but which wasn't available neither in PMBS nor
> in
> OBS. So, he created his version of libcec >= 4.0, and everything was
> OK
> for his home: project. But, when the package got moved to the
> Multimedia
> repository, kodi-17 didn't build because the current policy appears
> to
> dictate that libcec >= 4.0 must go through Factory first and only
> then
> can be linked from there
Hello

Technically it can be linked even from its devel project, but it should
not be needed in future - libcec got accepted to factory today and
there is running maintenance update for it for Leap 42.1 and 42.2

Next hopefully I will be faster in submitting it

Cheers

Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=mkFG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----