[packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Stefan Botter jsj at jsj.dyndns.org
Mon Feb 22 19:11:15 CET 2016

Hi Sagi,

On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:44:06 +0200
Sagi Ben-Akiva <sagiben at gmail.com> wrote:
> Kodi Jarvis 16.0 was released yesterday, and it is already being
> built in my home project.
> https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/home:sagiben/kodi.binary-addons
> https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/home:sagiben/kodi
> In latest Kodi, all the binary addons were branched out from Kodi
> github repository to a separate repositories.
> I did the same and divided Kodi and it's binary addons into 2
> packages : kodi, kodi.binary-addons.
> My questions are :
> 1. Do you think we should keep them in 2 separate projects or merge
> them to one ?
> 2. Should we provide a standalone package for each binary addon ?

I would prefer option 1 - at least for the moment. I do not know how
other distributions handle this, but it might be a dependency nightmare
if any binary addon is separate.

Just a question: you have also kodi-pvr.addons in your repo, is this a
subset of the binary.addons?


Stefan Botter zu Hause
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.links2linux.de/pipermail/packman/attachments/20160222/b3deae1a/attachment.sig>

More information about the Packman mailing list