toddrme2178 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 1 17:55:02 CET 2011
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Detlef Reichelt <detlef at die-mafia.de> wrote:
> Moin Todd,
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:23:17 -0500, todd rme wrote:
>> Does backintime have any licensing issues? It seems to be a useful
>> tool, and I was thinking of submitting your version to the KDE:Extra
>> OBS project. Would that be acceptable? I am not sure it will be
>> accepted, but I think it is at least worth trying.
> no, backintime hasn't any licensing issues.
> KDE-Repo? Why? It has a KDE and a Gnome GUI...
Because it seems like a useful tool, and KDE:Extra is a pretty
standard repo for KDE users on openSUSE. If someone wants to submit
it to one of the gnome repos as well, they can do so. KDE:Extra has a
number of applications with both Gnome and KDE guis, if I recall
One advantage of having it in the KDE:Extra repo is that it is
properly built against the different versions of KDE that are
available (often as many as 5 or 6 different versions) and the proper
version of Qt (usually only 1 or 2 versions), while packman is only
built against the default version. I am not sure this is as much of
an issue currently with gnome, although it may become one with the
coming changes in Gnome.
More information about the Packman