[packman] [PM] songbird 1.1.1-0.pm.5 (openSUSE 11.1/x86_64)
wolfgang at rosenauer.org
Wed Mar 25 14:15:45 CET 2009
> Am Mittwoch, 25. März 2009 schrieb:
>> Toni schrieb:
>>> Am Mittwoch, 25. März 2009 schrieb Wolfgang Rosenauer:
>>>> Hi Toni,
>>>> I just had a short look at your songbird package.
>>>> I see the package requires amongst others:
>>>> but the package doesn't provide any of these. So you are depending on
>>>> other packages (namely mozilla-xulrunner190 on recent openSUSE versions)
>>>> without need.
>>> those libraries are "hidden" in the package, otherwise the songbird
>>> package will be handled as a provider for those libs by the installers
>>> and conflicts with existing xulrunner/taglib packages.
>>> And when rpm installs this package it detects these libs internally. So
>>> this is attended.
>> Hmm, then I missed a change in RPM. Back when I was doing things like
>> that it didn't notice the internal provides unless they were actually in
>> the exported RPM provides.
>> When did that change in RPM?
Ok, you are wrong. I just verified with a test openSUSE 11.1
installation. If no package is installed which actually exports the
stuff above RPM refuses to install your songbird package because of
these missing dependencies.
As I wrote it's a bug that you require other packages while you don't
Please fix that. (I could give you some advice on that since I have some
experience with that stuff)
>>>> You are also delivering Mozilla's NSPR and NSS libraries which is not
>>>> exactly an issue but could be a thing to improve.
>>> read the comments in the spec file:
>>> # Songbird requires an upstream patched xulrunner and taglib to function
>>> And as long upstream insists in having a own private xulrunner version
>>> nad taglib version, this is the onlypossibility to provide this package.
>>> They even don't fix known issues in the emebedded xulrunner package.
>>> Formerly they needed also a complete internal gstreamer framework .... So
>>> things are getting better with each release.
>> That all has nothing to do with NSPR and NSS though ;-)
> songbird is only compilable and working with the sources from the
> songbird-vendor tarball. xulrunner was a example, same for the nspr and nss.
> If you want a songbird linked against system installed libraries, file a bug
> to songbird upstream ...
> I would also prefer such a package as it safes a lot of patching and compile
> time for me and other package providers.
It was just a suggestion. No need to argue about. I can't find any
reference that Songbird patches NSPR or NSS for anything though and that
would make it possible to use system provided libs but no worries.
More information about the Packman