[packman] 32-bit vs 64-bit versions of amarok for openSUSE-11.1

Manfred Hollstein manfred at die-hollsteins.de
Sun Dec 6 15:33:49 CET 2009


Hi there,

looking at the versions of amarok-1.4.10 for openSUSE-11.1 on 32-bit and
64-bit shows that they appear to be out of sync:

3412 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users 3491160 Oct 27 04:33 i586/amarok-1.4.10-103.pm.107.39.i586.rpm
7692 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users 7876097 Oct 27 04:33 i586/amarok-lang-1.4.10-103.pm.107.39.i586.rpm
  20 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users   19376 Oct 27 04:33 i586/amarok-libvisual-1.4.10-103.pm.107.39.i586.rpm
  16 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users   13776 Oct 27 04:33 i586/amarok-packman-1.4.10-103.pm.107.39.i586.rpm
  60 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users   59839 Oct 27 04:33 i586/amarok-xine-1.4.10-103.pm.107.39.i586.rpm
  36 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users   32921 Oct 27 04:33 i586/amarok-yauap-1.4.10-103.pm.107.39.i586.rpm
3392 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users 3470717 Oct 31 00:17 x86_64/amarok-1.4.10-103.pm.107.42.x86_64.rpm
7692 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users 7875777 Oct 31 00:17 x86_64/amarok-lang-1.4.10-103.pm.107.42.x86_64.rpm
  20 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users   19778 Oct 31 00:17 x86_64/amarok-libvisual-1.4.10-103.pm.107.42.x86_64.rpm
  16 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users   13760 Oct 31 00:17 x86_64/amarok-packman-1.4.10-103.pm.107.42.x86_64.rpm
  60 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users   60298 Oct 31 00:17 x86_64/amarok-xine-1.4.10-103.pm.107.42.x86_64.rpm
  36 -rw-rw-r-- 1 manfred users   33524 Oct 31 00:17 x86_64/amarok-yauap-1.4.10-103.pm.107.42.x86_64.rpm

As you can see, the date is different as well as the version number. The
changelog doesn't show any obvious difference, but it's not very current
either:

  * Tue Sep 01 2009 Pascal Bleser <pascal.bleser at opensuse.org> 1.4.10-103.pm.1
  - fix wikipedia support again

I usually try to keep my 32-bit and 64-bit systems in sync, but amarok
apparently prevents this. Is there any reason for this, or can the
32-bit version be rebuilt?

TIA, cheers.

l8er
manfred

PS: I'm not subscribed to this list, so please copy me explicitly on any
    feedback.




More information about the Packman mailing list