[packman] [PM] libschroedinger 1.0.5-0.pm.1 (openSUSE 10.3/i586)

[Toni]

Am Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2008 schrieb Christian Morales Vega:
> See
> http://forums.opensuse.org/applications/396805-mplayer-libschroedinger-1-0-
>so-0-issue.html.
>
> libschroedinger 1.0.5 requires liboil >= 0.3.13 but the Packman
> package doesn't specifies this. This isn't a problem in openSUSE 11.0
> since the lowest available version is 0.3.14, but 10.3 comes with
> liboil 0.3.9.
> Since the libschroedinger package doesn't explicitly require liboil >=
> 0.3.13 the problem seen in the forum can easily happen (specially with
> people that has problems with/don't understand Videolan vs Packman
> packages).
>
> Also note that liboil0 package from Packman (liboil0-0.3.15-0.pm.1 for
> openSUSE 10.3) provides "liboil = 0.3.12". Is this normal? Should not
> provide "liboil = 0.3.15"? Right now liboil Packman package could not
> provide "liboil >= 0.3.13" and libschroedinger should require "liboil0
>
> >= 0.3.13" to have compatibility with the Packman liboil package.
>
> Note that following openSUSE packages interpretation of Shared Library
> Packaging Policy* liboil package name should be "liboil-0_3-0" and not
> "liboil0".
>
> * See libschroedinger-1_0-0, libjingle-0_3-0, libgtksourceview-2_0-0,
> libgtk-vnc-1_0-0, libgthread-2_0-0, libgstreamer-0_10-0,
> libgstinterfaces-0_10-0, libgstapp-0_10-0, libgobject-2_0-0,
> libgmodule-2_0-0, libglib-2_0-0, libgio-2_0-0, libgda-xslt-3_0-0,
> libcppunit-1_12-0, libatk-1_0-0 and
> gstreamer-0_10-libschroedinger-1_0-0.

I followed your arguments and hopefully the new packages are 
providing/obsoleting the right names.


-- 
have fun
Toni