[packman] Re: [PM] pulseaudio 0.9.8 (openSUSE 10.3/i586)
rodrigo at novell.com
Wed Jan 2 12:14:09 CET 2008
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 11:29 +0100, Toni wrote:
> Am Montag, 24. Dezember 2007 schrieb Schlomo Schapiro:
> > Hi,
> > upgrading from SuSE 10.3 installed pulseaudio 0.9.6 to PM pulseaudio 0.9.8
> > fails because the package layout of the PM packages is different than the
> > SuSE layout and some SuSE provided tools require the SuSE package which
> > apparently is not covered by an obsoletes clause in the corresponding PM
> > package:
> > file /usr/lib/libpulse.so.0 from install of libpulse0-0.9.8-0.pm.1
> > conflicts with file from package pulseaudio-libs-0.9.6-39
> > file /usr/lib/libpulse-browse.so.0 from install of
> > libpulse-browse0-0.9.8-0.pm.1 conflicts with file from package
> > pulseaudio-libs-0.9.6-39
> > Can you please fix the PM pulseaudio packages to cleanly install ?
> no, I won't.
> see discussion for topic pulseaudio on our mailinglist in November/December:
> And for your information, these pulseaudio packages in the build-server
> repository are no officially SuSE-packages, same for the my packman packages.
they are starting to become official, since they are scheduled to be
part of 11.0. The packages I did are different from yours because I got
the package layout from Fedora, who have PA already well integrated.
> My packages follow the rules of the shared-library policy from SuSE. So feel
> free to file a bug, for the "wrong" packaged (in sense of the shared library
> policy from SuSE) pulseaudio packages in the Build-Server repository.
I sent a mail a few weeks ago about fixing my packages, so will do that
later on. I'd appreciate if you could have a look at both your packages
and mines and see what else you think should be changed.
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo at novell.com>
More information about the Packman