[packman] live vs live555 and redland-bindings-1.0.14

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:46:51PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> On 25 July 2012 16:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linux.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:56:12PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> >> On 25 July 2012 15:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linux.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> >> >> On 2 June 2012 14:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linux.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> >> >> >> On 18 April 2012 01:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linux.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Ok, but where did the version of redland-bindings come from?  Shouldn't
> >> >> >> > I just link in the X11:common:Factory versions of redland AND
> >> >> >> > redland-bindings into Tumbleweed, instead of using the version of
> >> >> >> > redland from KDE-4.8?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Sure.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Now done.
> >> >>
> >> >> No, you didn't.
> >> >>
> >> >> $ osc cat -u openSUSE:Tumbleweed redland _link
> >> >> <link package="redland" project="KDE:Release:48"
> >> >> rev="f6ced863225677c1d17fbf3e4f05dcf3">
> >> >
> >> > $ ./check_package X11:common:Factory/redland
> >> > # redland is up to date.
> >>
> >> They are up to date. And I'm going to delete the package from Packman
> >> since that fixes the problem. But that doesn't mean you are linking
> >> Tumbleweed's redland to X11:common:Factory as you said you did.
> >
> > Well, my scripts, as shown above, sure think that it is linked properly :)
> >
> >> If you have any good reason to link to KDE:Release:48 and that wasn't
> >> just a mistake great, I am not discussing that decision. Just
> >> informing.
> >
> > That's because it is the same exact package:
> >
> > $ osc cat -u KDE:Release:48 redland _link
> > <link package="redland" project="KDE:Distro:Factory" rev="1" vrev="1">
> > <patches>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > </patches>
> > </link>
> > $ osc cat -u KDE:Distro:Factory redland _link
> > <link project="X11:common:Factory" baserev="3f8fba80afab3f422aba84faaa247f71">
> >   <patches>
> >     <branch/>
> >   </patches>
> > </link>
> >
> > So we are linking in the correct package into openSUSE:Tumbleweed, it just so
> > happens that is the same package that is in KDE:Release:48 at the moment.
> >
> > So all is well, right?
> 
> Yes.
> Really, I just told you in case you though you were directly linking
> to X11:common:Factory. If you know you aren't and are happy with that
> I don't see any problem.

I am linking to X11:common:Factory, that is what the first run of my
scripts showed.  So if they change KDE:Release:48 in the future, all
should be fine, as I'm not even looking at that repo now for the
package.

The fact that it's the identical package in all of the different repos
right now is what is confusing to those of us who look at the _link in
openSUSE:Tumbleweed, but osc knows what is going on so all is good.

thanks,

greg k-h